So there.
Low expectations.
Good surprise.
It was in my opinion a fair adaptation. Of course, part of me screamed at some... details that were tweaked, some paths that didn't really follow the book storyline, or some characters that behave a bit strangely. But it's an adaptation, right? So why do we care? If I want the book story I'll read the book...
Why I liked it:
- Snape was as good as ever.
- Hermione was cuter than the previous movie, just as every movie (yes, in The Sorcerer's Stone she was better than in The Locked Broom Closet
- Beautiful landscapes as always.
- Classes! They ARE in a school! Incredible!
- Birds around Hermione. Loved that part in the book, it was pretty nice in the movie.
- Luna.
- Bellatrix. She left me unimpressed in the previous movie, but she was better actually.
- Quidditch!
- Rupert's love expression is priceless!
Why I didn't like it:
- 45 seconds of Tonks? Are you kidding me?
- Once again, Ron is demoted from the heart of the group to the stomach of the group.
- As always, Daniel Radcliffe proves to have the acting skills of a broomstick. EXCEPT when he acts like a moron under the influence of Felix Felicis. I grinned all the way.
- Narcissa. Seriously, what the lol?
- No "DON'T CALL ME COWARD!"? awww
- No funeral? lolwhut?
About other details... Where was Slughorn's big moustache?
The battle in Hogwarts? none
I don't remember Neville to have Potions in the book.
Cho was in the movie?
Did the ghoul in the Weasley's attic burn?
I'm sure I'm forgetting some...
SO... It was a nice way to spend 2h40. I was pretty sure I'd be disappointed, I'm glad I wasn't.
Quote of the day:
"If you don't open the door I'll eviscerate you very slowly until you have nothing left inside you. And you'll still be alive to see that."
Imoen





